Queer Press

Sources & Fact-Checking

Committed to providing accurate, fair, and responsible journalism for readers from contributors like you

As a rule, we avoid relying on single sources. Our stories are typically supported by multiple sources, which allows us to present well-rounded, corroborated, and reliable information. This practice is crucial in maintaining the accuracy and depth of our reporting.

The use of unnamed sources is approached with caution and considered only under specific circumstances. We recognize that in certain situations, particularly those involving sensitive LGBTQ+ issues, sources may require anonymity to protect them from real or perceived retaliation, harm, or stigma. In such cases, the decision to use an unnamed source is made with the utmost care and involves a thorough evaluation of the source's credibility and the necessity of anonymity for their protection.

Decisions to use unnamed sources are not taken lightly and involve rigorous vetting. These decisions are subject to approval by senior editorial staff. We ensure that the use of such sources is essential to the story and that the information provided is not obtainable by other means.

  • When unnamed sources are used, we are transparent with our audience about the reasons for anonymity, without revealing sensitive details that could compromise the source. We strive to provide as much information as possible about the nature of the source and the reasons for their anonymity to maintain trust with our readers.
In all our sourcing decisions, we are guided by ethical considerations, prioritizing the safety, dignity, and privacy of our sources, especially when dealing with vulnerable individuals or sensitive issues within the LGBTQ+ community.
Through this sourcing policy, Queer Press aims to uphold the principles of responsible journalism, ensuring that our reporting is not only informative and impactful but also ethical and respectful of the sources that contribute to our stories.

At Queer Press, we are committed to providing accurate, fair, and responsible journalism that reflects the diverse voices and experiences of the LGBTQ+ community. Our sourcing policy outlines the principles and guidelines we follow when gathering information, interviewing sources, and using external content to ensure the highest standards of integrity and credibility in our reporting.

Sourcing is vital for Queer Press because it upholds the publication’s commitment to accuracy, fairness, transparency, and accountability. It helps maintain its credibility, represent diverse voices, and ensure that readers receive reliable and trustworthy information on LGBTQ+ issues and related topics.

This policy outlines the principles guiding the use of sources at Queer Press, emphasizing the importance of multiple source verification, careful use of unnamed sources, editorial oversight, transparency, and ethical considerations in their journalistic practices.

See our public submission guide for additional informatoin.

SOURCEDESCRIPTION:
SnopesOne of the oldest and most well-known fact-checking websites, Snopes specializes in investigating urban legends, internet rumors, and other stories of questionable origin.
PolitiFactA Pulitzer Prize-winning website, PolitiFact is renowned for its "Truth-O-Meter" ratings. It focuses on verifying claims made by politicians, political parties, and other influential figures.
FactCheck.orgRun by the Annenberg Public Policy Center, FactCheck.org aims to reduce the level of deception and confusion in U.S. politics by monitoring the factual accuracy of statements by political players.
Reuters Fact CheckReuters provides a fact-checking service that debunks false and misleading information found on social media and other platforms.
BBC Reality CheckPart of the BBC News website, Reality Check provides fact-checking services that focus on claims made in the news, particularly those that go viral on social media.
Washington Post Fact CheckerKnown for its "Pinocchio" ratings, this fact-checking service evaluates the truthfulness of claims made by politicians and political advocacy groups.
AP Fact CheckThe Associated Press offers a fact-checking service that examines the factual accuracy of claims made in the news, often focusing on statements made by public figures and viral social media posts.
Full FactA UK-based independent fact-checking charity, Full Fact rigorously checks claims made by politicians, public institutions, and journalists.
Lead StoriesSpecializing in debunking fake news, especially the kind that goes viral, Lead Stories uses a combination of automated scanning and human fact-checking.
Hoax-SlayerFocused on debunking email and social media hoaxes, as well as Internet scams, Hoax-Slayer provides a valuable resource for verifying digital content.
Media Bias/Fact CheckWhile primarily a media bias resource, this site also offers fact-checking and detailed analyses of various news sources' reliability.
Check Your FactAn independent fact-checking website that is a part of the Daily Caller, it offers non-partisan fact-checks.
Science FeedbackA network of scientists who fact-check media coverage of scientific and medical topics, providing detailed analyses of the scientific accuracy of various claims.
Poynter Institute's International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN)While not a direct fact-checking service, the IFCN offers resources, training, and a code of principles for fact-checkers, and it lists verified signatories that adhere to its standards.

Our Editorial Team

A passionate team of creators building a global impact through storytelling

Zackary Bauch

Creative mind of Publibox

Salvatore Roberts

Founder & CEO of Publibox

Angela Padberg

Manager

Carolyn Hudson

Designer

Become a Contributor

Let’s discuss a content partnership.